Quach

Quach v. Walgreen Co.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 19, 20251:25-cv-00220California1,042 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DACIANA QUACH, Case No. 24-cv-07052-JSW

Plaintiff, ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT

v. COURT FOR THE EASTERN

DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA –

WALGREEN CO., BAKERSFIELD DIVISION Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 25, 28, 29, 31

12 Plaintiff in this case brings claims against Defendant for retaliation, in violation of California’s Labor Code, and for wrongful termination. On January 3, 2025, the parties filed their joint case management conference statement, and Defendant stated that Plaintiff worked at one of its stores in Bakersfield, California. (Dkt. No. 24.) Based on that representation, the Court, sua sponte, ordered the parties to show cause why this case should not be transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1404(a). See Costlow v. Weeks, 790 F.2d 1486, 1488 (9th Cir. 1986). The Court has considered the parties’…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.