Jones

(PC) Heyligar v. Jones

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 20, 20252:23-cv-01899California578 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARLINGTON ANSELMO HEYLIGAR, No. 2:23-cv-1899 CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND REVISED SCHEDULING

ORDER

JONES, et al., Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. Defendants filed a second motion to modify the scheduling order, seeking an extension of time to file their dispositive motion. Good cause appearing, defendants’ motion is granted. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, who identifies as transgender, filed this action on September 5, 2023. (ECF No. 1.) This action proceeds on plaintiff’s claims that on July 10, 2022, defendants T. Jones, E. Corter, and O. Beltran used excessive force (Claim I), and defendant Richards was deliberately indifferent to plaintiff’s serious medical and mental health needs (Claim II), all in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 1.) On May 28, 2024, the Court issued a Discovery and Scheduling Order, setting the discovery deadline for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.