Jones
(PC) Heyligar v. Jones
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARLINGTON ANSELMO HEYLIGAR, No. 2:23-cv-1899 CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND REVISED SCHEDULING
ORDER
JONES, et al., Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. Defendants filed a second motion to modify the scheduling order, seeking an extension of time to file their dispositive motion. Good cause appearing, defendants’ motion is granted. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, who identifies as transgender, filed this action on September 5, 2023. (ECF No. 1.) This action proceeds on plaintiff’s claims that on July 10, 2022, defendants T. Jones, E. Corter, and O. Beltran used excessive force (Claim I), and defendant Richards was deliberately indifferent to plaintiff’s serious medical and mental health needs (Claim II), all in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 1.) On May 28, 2024, the Court issued a Discovery and Scheduling Order, setting the discovery deadline for…