(PS) Guyton v. City of Stockton

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 20, 20252:24-cv-00922California6,019 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTONIO GUYTON, No. 2:24-cv-0922 DC AC PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER and CITY OF STOCKTON, STOCKTON FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

POLICE DEPARTMANT, VINCENT

MAGANA, COURTLYN CHAPPELL, Defendants. 17 Plaintiff is proceeding in this matter pro se, and pre-trial proceedings are accordingly referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). Before the court is a motion to dismiss filed by all defendants on December 3, 2024. ECF No. 13 (memorandum filed at ECF No. 14). Plaintiff opposed the motion, ECF No. 17, and defendants submitted a reply brief, ECF No. 19. The parties appeared before the undersigned for oral argument on February 5, 2025, with plaintiff appearing on behalf of himself and counsel appearing on behalf of defendants. ECF No. 22. For the reasons that follow, the undersigned recommends defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 13) be GRANTED, but that plaintiff be given leave to file a Third…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.