(PS) Coelho v. US Army Reserves

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 20, 20252:24-cv-02431California693 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KELLEY COELHO, No. 2:24-cv-2431 TLN AC PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS UNITED STATES ARMY RESERVES, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The case was accordingly referred to the undersigned for pretrial matters by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21). Plaintiff filed a complaint and paid the filing fee on September 6, 2024. ECF No. 1. It appears that plaintiff is attempting to sue the U.S. Army and several individuals who appear to be officers in the Army, though this is not entirely clear from the complaint. Id. at 1-6. A summons and scheduling order was issued, directing plaintiff to serve a copy of the scheduling order and to complete service of process within 90 days of filing the complaint. ECF Nos. 2, 3. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to complete service within 90 days may result in dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 40(m). Id. On October 3, 2024, plaintiff filed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.