Andrew Watters v. Mahsa Parviz

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 21 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANDREW G. WATTERS, No. 23-35601

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:23-cv-00755-RSL

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MAHSA PARVIZ,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Robert S. Lasnik, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 21, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: FRIEDLAND, BENNETT, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff-Appellant Andrew G. Watters, appearing pro se, appeals the district

court’s dismissal of an action filed against Defendant-Appellee Mahsa Parviz in the

Western District of Washington. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). we AFFIRM.

Plaintiff’s initial complaint consisted mainly of the contents of a webpage run

by…