Bondi

Sebastian Miguel v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 21, 202523-1332California356 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 21 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CATARINA SEBASTIAN No. 23-1332 MIGUEL; SINDI ENCARNACION Agency Nos.

MATEO SEBASTIAN; YENIFER ISABEL A206-843-626

MATEO SEBASTIAN, A206-843-627

A206-843-628

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 19, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: PAEZ, TALLMAN, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

Catarina Sebastian Miguel and her daughters, natives and citizens of

Guatemala, petition for review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (BIA) dismissing their appeal from an order of an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.