Elmore

Elmore v. Conley CA2/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 21, 2025B339503California3,431 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kim, J.

Filed 2/21/25 Elmore v. Conley CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

CECIL ELMORE, B339503

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 22STCV39872) v.

TED D. CONLEY et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Anne Richardson, Judge. Affirmed. Cecil Elmore, in propria persona, for Plaintiff and Appellant. Ray, Aloia & Conley, Burdick M. Ray, and Ted D. Conley for Defendants and Respondents. __________________________________ In August 2023, the trial court entered judgment against plaintiff and appellant Cecil Elmore in favor of defendants and respondents Ted D. Conley; Ray, Aloia & Conley, L.L.P.; Quinn Nguyen; Burdick M. Ray;…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.