Multiple Energy Technologies, LLC v. Seth Casden
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
O
2 3 4 5 6
United States District Court Central District of California
11 MULTIPLE ENERGY Case № 2:21-cv-01149-ODW (RAOx)
TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,
12 Plaintiff, ORDER RE POST-TRIAL MOTIONS 13 v. [218][219][220][228]
SETH CASDEN,
Defendant.
17 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Multiple Energy Technologies, LLC (“MET”) brought this action 20 against Defendant Seth Casden for false advertising and tortious interference with 21 contractual relations. After a jury trial, the Court granted in part MET’s Federal Rule 22 of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 50(a) motion on one claim, the jury returned a verdict in 23 favor of MET on the second, and the Court issued a Post-Trial Order (“PTO”) 24 addressing the remaining claims and issues. (Verdict, ECF No. 190; PTO, ECF 25 No. 198.) Casden and MET now renew post-trial motions. (ECF Nos. 218, 219, 220, 26 228.) The Court deemed the motions appropriate for decision without oral argument. 27 Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-15. As the motions overlap, the Court addresses 28…