United States v. Shirley Morgan
Opinion
Opinion
Nguyen 2 UNITED STATES V . MORGAN, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , No. 12-10056 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 4:10-cr-02880-
JGZ-CRP-
SHIRLEY ANNE MORGAN ,
Defendant-Appellant. AMENDED
OPINION
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Jennifer G. Zipps, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted March 12, 2013—Berkeley, California
Filed June 3, 2013 Amended July 15, 2013
Before: Raymond C. Fisher, Consuelo M. Callahan, and Jacqueline H. Nguyen, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Nguyen UNITED STATES V . MORGAN
SUMMARY*
Criminal Law
Affirming the denial of a motion to suppress post-arrest statements, the panel held that a Border Patrol agent’s reading of an I-214 Form, which is normally attendant to arrest and custody, did not constitute a re-initiation of interrogation in violation of Miranda v. Arizona, where the agent made no effort to question the defendant or secure a waiver of her rights.
The panel also held that the combination of circumstances – re-advising the defendant of her Miranda rights, processing drugs seized from her vehicle…