United States v. Roberto Ramos-Perez

Good Law
533 F. App'x 737
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 15, 201312-50219California290 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Defendant Roberto Ramos-Perez appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to dismiss an indictment charging him with being a previously deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 , and for using a false document to gain admission to the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1546 (a). After the court denied his motion, Defendant entered a conditional guilty plea, preserving the dismissal ruling for appeal. We affirm.

1. Defendant first argues that his deportation was invalid because his conviction for assault with a deadly weapon, in violation of section 245(a)(1) of the California Penal Code, was not a conviction for a crime of moral turpitude. Our recent decision in Ceron v. Holder, 712 F.3d 426, 427-28 (9th Cir.2013), forecloses this argument. In Cerón, we held that this exact crime qualifies categorically as a crime involving moral turpitude.

2. Defendant also argues that he is entitled to the “petty offense” exception to inadmissibility, 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (a)(2)(A)(ii)(II), for his conviction of grand theft, in violation of section 487 of the California Penal Code. This argument is unavailing because it depends on the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.