Beyard

Beyard v. Pentagon Federal Credit Union

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 21, 20251:21-cv-01063California2,441 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DENISE BEYARD, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-01063-KJM-SAB

Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO EXCLUDE PLAINTIFFS

v. FROM USING EXPERT TESTIMONY;

MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER FOR

PENTAGON FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, LIMITED PURPOSE

Defendant. (ECF Nos. 77, 83, 88)

16 Currently before the Court is Defendant Pentagon Federal Credit Union’s motion to preclude Plaintiffs Denise Beyard, Caroline Cardoza, and Calvin James (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) from using expert testimony in connection with any motion, including any motion for class certification, or at trial. (ECF No. 77.) The motion was referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. A hearing was held in this matter on February 19, 2025. (ECF No. 104.) Counsel Taras Kick and Tyler Dosaj appeared on behalf of Plaintiffs. Counsel Michael Graziano appeared on behalf of Defendant. Having considered the moving, opposition, and reply papers, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.