Aydin Kocataskin v. Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 21, 20252:24-cv-10204California2,386 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AYDIN KOCATASKIN, as guardian for Case No. 2:24-cv-10204-SPG-MAA 11 minor son, B.K., and his minor son, B.K., ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 12 Plaintiff, MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT [ECF NO. 7] v.

SANTA MONICA-MALIBU UNIFIED

SCHOOL DISTRICT; COLEEN

DAVENPORT, an individual; ANTONIO SHELTON, an individual; JON KEAN, an individual; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, 18 Defendants. 19 20 Before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 7-1 (“Motion”)) filed by Defendants Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District (the “District”), Coleen Davenport, Antonio Shelton, and Jon Kean (collectively, “Defendants”). The Court has read and considered the Motion and concluded that it is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-15. Having considered the parties’ submissions, the relevant law, and the record in this case, the Court GRANTS the Motion. Because the Court dismisses Plaintiff’s sole federal law claims,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.