McComas

(PC) Drake v. McComas

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 21, 20251:22-cv-01149California892 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAM DRAKE, Case No. 1:22-cv-01149-JLT-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

TO STAY DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINE

v. (ECF No. 55) MCCOMAS, et al.,

ORDER STAYING DISPOSITIVE MOTION

Defendants. DEADLINE PENDING RESOLUTION OF

PLAINTIFF’S INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL

16 17 Plaintiff Sam Drake (“Plaintiff”) is a pretrial detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s second amended complaint on the following claims: (1) violation of the First Amendment based on a facial challenge to Fresno County Jail (“FCJ”) Policy #E-120 and #E-410 against Defendants Mims, McComas, and Zanoni; (2) violation of the First Amendment based on an as-applied challenge to FCJ Policy #E-120 and #E-410 against Defendants Enriquez, Keoniyom, Nichols, and Snyder; and (3) violation of Due Process for returning Plaintiff’s mail against Defendants Enriquez, Keoniyom,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.