Turing Video Technology, Inc. v. AGI7 Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 21, 20255:24-cv-04606California4,538 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TURING VIDEO TECHNOLOGY, INC., Case No. 24-cv-04606-EKL

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. COMPEL ARBITRATION AND

MOTION TO STAY

AGI7 INC., Re: Dkt. Nos. 13, 30 Defendant.

12 Plaintiff Turing Video Technology, Inc. (“Turing”) alleges that Defendant AGI7 Inc. (“AGI7”) misappropriated its trade secrets and engaged in unfair business practices. Compl. ¶ 6, ECF No. 1-1. AGI7 moves to compel arbitration and to stay this action while arbitration is pending. Mot. to Stay the Action & Compel Arbitration, ECF No. 30 (“Motion”). The Court carefully reviewed the parties’ briefs and heard oral argument on October 9, 2024. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS the motion to compel arbitration and STAYS this action until the arbitration concludes. I. BACKGROUND1 Turing is “an innovative video surveillance and robot platform” and a “pioneer in the field of AI-based surveillance.” Compl. ¶ 2. Turing was founded in part by Song Cao, who…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.