Diaz

Diaz v. City of Merced

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 21, 20251:23-cv-00065California1,706 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5 ARMANDO DIAZ, Case No.: 1:23-CV-00065-JLT-SKO Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

APPLICATION TO EXTEND THE

vs. DISCOVERY DEADLINE TO PERMIT

DISCOSURE OF EXPERTS, REBUTTAL

CITY OF MERCED, CODY McCOMB, EXPERTS, AND TO COMPLETE NICOLAS DEJON, DOMINIC SAELEE, and EXPERT DISCOVERY DOES 1-15, inclusive (Doc. 30) Defendants. 11 12 I. INTRODUCTION On February 7, 2024, Plaintiff filed a motion to modify the pretrial scheduling order, (Doc. 21 (the “Motion”)), as partially modified by minute orders, (Docs. 23, 25), to reopen expert discovery to allow the parties to disclose experts, rebuttal experts, and to complete expert discovery. (Doc. 30). The Court has considered the Motion and Opposition, (Doc. 31), as well as Plaintiff’s supplemental declaration in support of his motion, (Doc. 32). For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s request to (1) reopen and extend the expert discovery deadlines.1 II. BACKGROUND …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.