Diaz
Diaz v. City of Merced
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5 ARMANDO DIAZ, Case No.: 1:23-CV-00065-JLT-SKO Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
APPLICATION TO EXTEND THE
vs. DISCOVERY DEADLINE TO PERMIT
DISCOSURE OF EXPERTS, REBUTTAL
CITY OF MERCED, CODY McCOMB, EXPERTS, AND TO COMPLETE NICOLAS DEJON, DOMINIC SAELEE, and EXPERT DISCOVERY DOES 1-15, inclusive (Doc. 30) Defendants. 11 12 I. INTRODUCTION On February 7, 2024, Plaintiff filed a motion to modify the pretrial scheduling order, (Doc. 21 (the “Motion”)), as partially modified by minute orders, (Docs. 23, 25), to reopen expert discovery to allow the parties to disclose experts, rebuttal experts, and to complete expert discovery. (Doc. 30). The Court has considered the Motion and Opposition, (Doc. 31), as well as Plaintiff’s supplemental declaration in support of his motion, (Doc. 32). For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s request to (1) reopen and extend the expert discovery deadlines.1 II. BACKGROUND …