Roberts

Roberts v. Curtis CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 24, 2025D082893California1,562 words

Opinion

Opinion

Buchanan, J.

Filed 2/24/25 Roberts v. Curtis CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DELORES ROBERTS, D082893

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2020- 00019064-PR-GE-CTL)

WILLIAM CURTIS,

Objector and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Olga Alvarez, Judge. Affirmed. William Curtis, in pro. per, for Objector and Appellant. Higgs Fletcher & Mack, Steven M. Brunolli and John Morris for Plaintiff and Respondent. William Curtis appeals from a judgment granting Delores Roberts’s petition for the return of property to the estate of Curtis’s minor children under Probate Code section 850. Curtis contends that the trial court abused its discretion when it…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.