People v. Montenegro CA4/1

DISCUSSION

As we have noted, counsel has not identified any potentially meritorious issues. Counsel invites the court to exercise its discretion to independently review the record for error. To assist the court in its review, and in compliance with Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, counsel has identified a possible issue the was considered in evaluating the potential merits of this appeal: Whether the court erred in denying the resentencing petition without first issuing an order to show cause and conducting an evidentiary hearing. We have independently reviewed the record for error. We have not discovered any potentially meritorious issues for reversal on appeal. Competent counsel has represented Montenegro on this appeal.

DISPOSITION

The order denying appellant’s petition for resentencing under section 1172.6 is affirmed.

HUFFMAN, Acting P. J.

WE CONCUR:

KELETY, J.

CASTILLO, J.

3