Pacificorp

Joshua Scott v. Pacificorp

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 24, 202523-35608California246 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 24 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSHUA M. SCOTT, Trustee of the Winona No. 23-35608 Road Trust u/t/d July 24, 2020, D.C. No. 1:22-cv-00174-AA Plaintiff-counter- defendant-Appellant,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

PACIFICORP, an Oregon corporation,

Defendant-counter-claimant- Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Ann L. Aiken, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 18, 2025**

Before: SILVERMAN, WARDLAW, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Joshua M. Scott, as trustee of the Winona Road Trust (“the Trust”), appeals

pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his action alleging federal and

state law claims concerning PacifiCorp’s right-of-way easement in properties

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). owned by the Trust. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.