Edward Clark v. State of California

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 24, 202523-55628California613 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 24 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EDWARD L. CLARK, Nos. 23-55628 23-55715 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 8:22-cv-01390-MWF-JPR v.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA; et al., MEMORANDUM*

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Michael W. Fitzgerald, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 18, 2025**

Before: SILVERMAN, WARDLAW, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Edward L. Clark appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action arising out of state court divorce

proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo.

Seismic Reservoir 2020, Inc. v. Paulsson, 785 F.3d 330, 333 (9th Cir. 2015)

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes these cases are suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (dismissal under Fed. R.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.