Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority v. Lebrun CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 24, 2025H050796California506 words

Opinion

Opinion

Grover, J.

Filed 2/24/25 Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority v. Lebrun CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

SANTA CLARA VALLEY H050796

TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, (Santa Clara County Super. Ct. No. 21CH010472) Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

ROLAND R. LEBRUN,

Defendant and Appellant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

We resolve this case by memorandum opinion pursuant to California Standards of Judicial Administration, Title 8, Standard 8.1. (See also People v. Garcia (2002) 97 Cal.App.4th 847, 853–855.) In public comments at a virtual meeting of the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) Policy Advisory Committee, defendant Roland Lebrun referred to “my gun” and stated, “I’m ready to shoot and take care of this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.