P.

P. v. Lemus CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 15, 2013B242965California307 words

Opinion

Opinion

Perren, J.

Filed 7/15/13 P. v. Lemus CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE, 2d Crim. No. B242965 (Super. Ct. No. YA076553) Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County)

v.

ALEXANDER LEMUS,

Defendant and Appellant.

Alexander Lemus appeals from the judgment entered after he pleaded no contest to misdemeanor grand theft. (Pen. Code, § 487, subd. (c).) The trial court suspended the imposition of sentence, and placed him on summary probation for 36 months, with various terms and conditions, including the payment of restitution. After conducting restitution proceedings, the court ordered appellant to pay the victim $80,000. Appellant worked as a collector, a counter, and a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.