P.

P. v. Birch CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 15, 2013C071345California650 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/15/13 P. v. Birch CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, C071345

v. (Super. Ct. No. 12HC00011)

CRAIG BIRCH,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appointed counsel for defendant Craig Birch asked this court to review the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).) Finding no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant, we affirm the judgment. We provide the following brief description of the facts and procedural history of the case. (See People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 110, 124.) In March 1984, defendant pled guilty to burglary (Pen. Code,1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.