(SS) Rinzel v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 24, 20251:22-cv-00143California544 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TIFFANI RINZEL, No. 1:22-CV-00143-DJC-GSA Plaintiff, v. ORDER MARTIN O’MALLEY, COMMISSIONER

OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

15 Defendant. (ECF Nos. 20, 21, 25)

17 Plaintiff Tiffani Rinzel initiated this action seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her application for Supplemental Security Income (SSI) pursuant to Title XVI of the Social Security Act. (ECF No. 1). The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On September 12, 2024, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations recommending that Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment be granted, that Defendant’s cross-motion be denied, and that the matter be remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 27 1 The Court has substituted Martin O’Malley, who has been appointed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.