Dorsett
Dorsett v. The City of San Diego
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM J. DORSETT, and Case No.: 24-cv-00813-AJB-AHG
ROGELIO FLORES,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
Plaintiffs, DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S v. MOTION TO DISMISS
THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO, and DOES (Doc. No. 6.) 1-25, inclusive, Defendants. 17 Before the Court is Defendant City of San Diego’s (“Defendant” or “City”) motion to dismiss Plaintiffs William J. Dorsett and Rogelio Flores’s (“Plaintiffs”) First Amended Complaint, (Doc. No. 5, “FAC”). (Doc. No. 6.) The motion is fully briefed. (See Doc. Nos. 6, 8, 9.) For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendant’s motion to dismiss. / / / 24 / / / 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 / / / I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs are “buskers,” or street artists and performers. (FAC ¶ 1.) Plaintiff William J. Dorsett paints and creates palm frond roses, “rose[es] made by hand from palm fronds,” which…