Trammell
Trammell v. Albertsons Companies, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARK TRAMMELL, individually and on Case No.: 24-cv-00862-AJB-AHG behalf of those similarly situated, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND Plaintiff,
DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S
13 v. MOTION TO DISMISS 14 ALBERTSONS COMPANIES, INC., a (Doc. No. 16) Delaware corporation, Defendant.
17 Presently pending before the Court is Defendant Albertsons Companies Inc.’s 18 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Mark Trammell’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) pursuant 19 to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8, 9(b), 12(b)(1), and 12(b)(6). (Doc. No. 16.) Plaintiff 20 filed an opposition to the motion to dismiss, (Doc. No. 18), to which Albertsons replied, 21 (Doc. No. 19). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1, the Court finds the instant matter 22 suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument. Accordingly, the Court 23 VACATES the motion hearing set for March 6, 2025. For the reasons stated herein, the 24 Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s…