Cox

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DALRADA PRECISION CORP., a Case No.: 24-cv-1122-AJB-DEB California corporation, wholly owned ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ subsidiary of DALRADA FINANCIAL

MOTION TO STRIKE

CORPORATION, a Wyoming corporation [Real Party in Interest], 14 Plaintiffs, 15 v.

STUART COX,

Defendant.

18 Before the Court is Plaintiffs Dalrada Precision Corp. and Dalrada Finincial Corp.’s 19 motion to strike Defendant Stuart Cox’s answer. (Doc. No. 19.) Defendant, proceeding pro 20 se, filed an opposition to the motion. (Doc. No. 24.) Plaintiffs did not file a reply. For the 21 reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ motion. 22 Plaintiffs bring this Complaint against Defendant for allegedly fraudulent acts and 23 misrepresentations perpetrated by Defendant, thereby inducing Plaintiffs into entering into 24 a contract for the purchase of a company owned by Defendant. (See generally Complaint 25 (“Compl.”), Doc. No. 1.) 26 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8 states that a party must “admit…