RMS NA, Inc. v. RMS (AUS) PTY LTD

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 24, 20253:24-cv-01366California7,322 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RMS NA, INC., Case No.: 24-cv-01366-AJB-MMP Plaintiff, ORDER: v. 13 (1) GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ RMS (AUS) PTY LTD, an Australian MOTIONS TO DISMISS; and limited proprietary company; RMS

GLOBAL PTY LTD, an Australian (2) DENYING AS MOOT limited proprietary company; P & J PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR BUTTIGIEG NOMINEES PTY LTD, an

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

Australian limited proprietary company;

PETER ANTHONY BUTTIGIEG, an (Doc. Nos. 50, 51, 53) individual; JENNIFER LYNN

BUTTIGIEG, an individual; ASCOTT 2 PTE LTD, an Australian limited 20 proprietary company; ADVENT PARTNERS 3 FUND LP, an Australian limited proprietary company; and DOES 22 1–100 Defendants.

24 Presently pending before the Court are Defendants RMS Global Pty Ltd (“RMS 25 Global”), P & J Buttigieg Nominees Pty Ltd (“P&J”), Peter Buttigieg, Jennifer Buttigieg, 26 Ascott 2 Pte Ltd…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.