A. L. v. City of Bakersfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 24, 20251:23-cv-00885California8,112 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 A.L., by and through his guardian ad Case No. 1:23-cv-00885-CDB litem, Jenae Lewis, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ Plaintiff, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT v. (Docs. 40-46) CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, et al., 12 Defendants.

13 14 Pending before the Court is the motion of Defendants City of Bakersfield and Officers Jacob Heinsohn, Eric Hearn, Stella Chavez, Jamie Orozco, and Amy Droege for partial summary judgment. (Doc. 40). Plaintiff A.L. filed an opposition on December 3, 2024. (Doc. 41). Defendants filed their reply on December 11, 2024. (Doc. 46).1 I. Background In connection with Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, the parties filed their own statements of disputed and undisputed facts. See (Docs. 40-2, 42, 43). Plaintiff’s statement of disputed facts relies in part on footage from Defendants’ body-worn cameras (“BWC”), video files of which were lodged with the Court. (Doc. 45). As to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.