Rutherford

Rutherford v. Steadman

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 24, 20253:24-cv-01627California5,409 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NICHOLAS JOVON RUTHERFORD, Case No.: 3:24-cv-01627-JAH-JLB

CDCR #BE-6676,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

Plaintiff, PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS vs. AND DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION

FOR FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM

S. STEADMAN, Warden;

PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)

P. WINGO, ISU Officer;

AND 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) B. GOMEZ, C/O;

C. CHADRY,

[ECF No. 2]

C/O; ESPENO,

18 Defendants. 19 20 Before the Court is a civil rights complaint filed by Plaintiff Nicholas Jovon Rutherford, a prisoner at Salinas Valley State Prison (“SVSP”), who is proceeding without counsel pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (See ECF No. 1, “Compl.”) Plaintiff claims prison officials at Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”) in San Diego violated his constitutional rights while he was incarcerated there in October 2022. (Id. at 2‒3.) Plaintiff has not paid the filing fee…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.