Ajaelo

Ajaelo v. Estrada

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 24, 20253:24-cv-02472California3,911 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JIDEOFOR AJAELO, Case No.: 24-cv-2472-AJB-MMP

CDCR #F-73516,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 vs. (1) GRANTING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS;

R. ESTRADA, et al.,

AND Defendants. 16 (2) SCREENING COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) & 1915A(b) 18 19 Plaintiff Jideofor Ajaelo is a state inmate proceeding pro se with a civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. No. 1.) Plaintiff has also filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (Doc. No. 2.) I. Motion to Proceed IFP All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of $405, consisting of a $350 statutory fee plus an additional administrative fee of $55, although the administrative fee does not apply to persons granted leave to proceed IFP. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) (Judicial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.