Jordan Mendez v. Jordan Peter Barnes
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JORDAN PETER MENDEZ, Case No. 8:23-cv-00725-SPG-SSC
Plaintiff,
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS
v. AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
SHERIFF CORONER DON
JUDGE [ECF NO. 61]
BARNES, ROBERT FLORES,
LIEUTENANT MANHART, DON
BARNES, and COUNTY OF
ORANGE,
17 Defendants.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”). Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been made. The Report recommends granting, in part, Defendants’ motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint and denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment. (ECF No. 61). In pertinent part, the Report recommends denial of the motion as to Plaintiff’s equal protection claim against Defendant Flores in his individual capacity. (Id. at 15-19). …