Jordan Mendez v. Jordan Peter Barnes

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 24, 20258:23-cv-00725California553 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JORDAN PETER MENDEZ, Case No. 8:23-cv-00725-SPG-SSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS

v. AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

SHERIFF CORONER DON

JUDGE [ECF NO. 61]

BARNES, ROBERT FLORES,

LIEUTENANT MANHART, DON

BARNES, and COUNTY OF

ORANGE,

17 Defendants.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”). Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been made. The Report recommends granting, in part, Defendants’ motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint and denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment. (ECF No. 61). In pertinent part, the Report recommends denial of the motion as to Plaintiff’s equal protection claim against Defendant Flores in his individual capacity. (Id. at 15-19). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.