Toscano

Toscano v. Ramos

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 24, 20253:25-cv-00186California1,200 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ADRIAN TOSCANO, Case No.: 25cv0186-LL-SBC

CDCR# V-19411,

ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL

Plaintiff, ACTION AS DUPLICATIVE v. PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 14 § 1915A(b)(1) AND DENYING AS

MOOT MOTION FOR LEAVE TO

SERGEANT RAMOS,

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Defendant. [ECF Nos. 1, 2] 18 Plaintiff Adrian Toscano, incarcerated at Centinela State Prison and proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. ECF No. 1. Plaintiff has also moved for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). ECF No. 2. Because Plaintiff raised the same claims against the same Defendant in a prior civil rights action, the Court DISMISSES this case as frivolous and DENIES AS MOOT his IFP motion. I. DISCUSSION The Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, obligates the Court to review complaints…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.