Ruffins

Ruffins v. Din

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 24, 20253:25-cv-00267California1,169 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TYREE RAYBON RUFFINS, Case No.: 25-cv-00267-AJB-SBC

CDCR #BJ-6459,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

Plaintiff, PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS v. AND DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

R. DIN, Lieutenant,

15 Defendant. (Doc. No. 2) 16 17 Plaintiff Tyree Raybon Ruffins (“Plaintiff”), a prisoner at Mule Creek State Prison (“MCSP”) in Ione, California proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Doc. No. 1, Complaint (“Compl.”)), together with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (Doc. No. 2 (“IFP”)). Plaintiff alleges Lieutenant R. Din violated his constitutional rights at Centinela State Prison in November 2021, by failing to follow “marriage chrono” protocol after Plaintiff and another prisoner named Wilson engaged in a fight.1 (See Compl. at 3; see also Doc. No. 1-2 at 1‒3.)

26 A “marriage chrono” is prison lingo for documentation signed by a prisoner attesting to his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.