(PS) Katumbusi v. Wasatch Property Management

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 24, 20252:22-cv-00250California1,918 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel. Case No. 2:22-cv-0250-DAD-JDP (PS)

FATIMA ANN KATUMBUSI,

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER; FINDINGS AND v. RECOMMENDATIONS

WASATCH PROPERTY

MANAGEMENT, et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiff Fatima Katumbusi, proceeding without counsel, filed a complaint against defendants Wasatch Property Management, Wasatch Holding, Reliant Management, Oak Valley, LLC; Oak Valley, L.P.; and Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment. She alleges that defendants violated the False Claims Act by submitting fraudulent claims to the Department of Housing and Urban Development through its Federal Housing Choice Voucher program, commonly referred to as “Section 8.” Plaintiff has also filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis and motions to seal, to redact exhibits, and for a preliminary injunctive. Her application to proceed in forma pauperis makes the required showing, see 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), and is therefore granted. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.