(PC) Lucero v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 24, 20252:23-cv-02844California297 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Timoithy Paul Lucero, No. 2:23-cv-02844-KJM-CSK Plaintiff, ORDER v. State of California, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is incarcerated and is not represented by an attorney. The case is referred to the 18 assigned Magistrate Judge under this court’s local rules. The previously assigned Magistrate Judge dismissed the complaint with leave to amend. ECF No. 9. Plaintiff amended his complaint, ECF No. 11, and the previously assigned Magistrate Judge recommended dismissing the complaint without leave to amend, ECF No. 12, finding the amended complaint, like its 22 predecessor, does not “demonstrate that plaintiff has a sincerely held religious belief,” id. at 4. 23 Plaintiff objects. ECF No. 14. The court has reviewed the file de novo. Although plaintiffs professed beliefs are unconventional and perhaps self-contradictory, a federal court cannot reject an otherwise…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.