Wendy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Lothar R. Eissel, IV, Case No. 2:24-cv-01422-KJM-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER Wendy, et al., Defendants. 16 On October 30, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on plaintiff, and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. See ECF No. 6. Plaintiff Lothar Eissel filed objections on November 12, 2024, and they were considered by the undersigned, see ECF No. 7. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). ///// ///// ] In accordance with the provisions of 28…