Chatigny

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EUGENE E. ANDREYEV, Case No. 2:24-cv-2651-TLN-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DANIEL CHATIGNY, et al., Defendant. 16 Plaintiff alleges that defendants Daniel Chatigny, a county executive officer; Wayne Woo, Placer County Sheriff; and certain Doe Placer County Sheriff’s Deputies violated his constitutional rights. As articulated, the complaint does not state a viable claim, and so I will dismiss it with leave to amend. Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis makes the required showing and will be granted. Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen the complaint of any claimant seeking permission to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any portion of the complaint that is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who…