Rojas

Rojas v. Ford Motor Co.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 24, 20252:24-cv-03793California656 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 9 JASMINE ROJAS, an individual, No. 2:24-cv-3793 WBS CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER RE: MOTION TO REMAND FORD MOTOR CO., a Delaware Corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants. 16 ----oo0oo---- Plaintiff Jasmine Rojas (“plaintiff”) filed this action in state court on November 14, 2024 against defendant Ford Motor Co. (“Ford”) and a fictitiously named defendant dealer alleging various claims based on her allegedly defective vehicle manufactured by Ford and sold to her by the dealer in Fairfield, California. (Docket No. 1-2.) Ford answered the complaint on December 23, 2024. (Docket No. 1-9.) Ford then removed the case to this court on December 31, 2024, based on diversity jurisdiction. (Docket No. 1 (citing 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332, 1441, 1446).) On January 13, 2025, 21 days 28 after Ford served its original answer, plaintiff amended her 2 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.