Sumana Forest Retreat v. County of San Diego, California

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 24, 20253:24-cv-01196California8,268 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SUMANA FOREST RETREAT, et al., Case No.: 24-cv-1196-RSH-DDL

Plaintiffs,

ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION TO DISMISS

PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,

COMPLAINT

Defendant. [ECF No. 16] 16 17 18 Before the Court is the County of San Diego’s (“the County’s”) motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 15, “FAC”). ECF No. 16. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7.1(d)(1), the Court finds the motion presented appropriate for resolution without oral argument. For the reasons below, the Court grants in part and denies in part the motion. I. BACKGROUND A. Plaintiffs’ Allegations The instant case arises from the County’s permitting and code enforcement actions taken in relation to property Plaintiffs intended for religious use. The FAC alleges as follows. 1. The Valley Center Property Plaintiff William Chu is a professor of Buddhist studies…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.