Perez

Perez v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 24, 20253:24-cv-00100California385 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TERESA P., Case No.: 24-cv-00100-AJB-DDL Plaintiff, ORDER: v. 13 (1) ADOPTING REPORT AND

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

RECOMMENDATION;

SECURITY,

Defendant. (2) REMANDING ACTION FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS

17 (Doc. Nos. 10, 16) 18 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Teresa P.’s social security appeal. (Doc. No. 10.) The Court referred the matter to Magistrate Judge David D. Leshner for a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”). (Doc. No. 16.) The R&R recommends remanding the matter back to the Commissioner for further administrative action. (Id. at 1, 14.) The parties were instructed to file written objections to the R&R no later than February 13, 2025, and replies no later than February 20, 2025. (Id. at 14.) Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) set forth a district judge’s duties in connection with a magistrate judge’s R&R.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.