Bondi

Meza Diaz v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 25, 202523-973California5,143 words

Opinion

Opinion

Paez, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRISEYDA MEZA No. 23-973

DIAZ; GABRIELA SEGUNDO

Agency Nos.

MEZA,

A209-390-110

A209-390-111

Petitioners, v. ORDER AND

AMENDED

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney OPINION General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted July 18, 2024 * Pasadena, California Filed October 8, 2024 Amended February 25, 2025 Before: Kim McLane Wardlaw, Richard A. Paez, and Gabriel P. Sanchez, Circuit Judges. Order; Opinion by Judge Paez

* The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). SUMMARY **

Immigration

The panel filed (1) an order (a) amending the opinion filed on October 8, 2024; (b) denying as moot the government’s petition for panel rehearing; and (c) indicating that no further petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc will be allowed; and (2) an amended opinion granting Briseyda Meza Diaz’s petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision affirming the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.