Key
Key v. Qualcomm Incorporated
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SARAH KEY; ANDREW No. 23-3354
WESTLEY; TERESE
D.C. No.
RUSSELL; CARRA ABERNATHY,
3:17-md-02773-
JSC
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v. OPINION
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, a Delaware Corporation,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Jacqueline Scott Corley, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted October 15, 2024 San Francisco, California
Filed February 25, 2025
Before: Ronald M. Gould, Jay S. Bybee, and Ryan D. Nelson, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge R. Nelson SUMMARY *
Antitrust Law
In a consolidated antitrust class action, the panel affirmed in part and vacated in part the district court’s partial dismissal and partial summary judgment in favor of defendant Qualcomm Inc. In an earlier suit, the Federal Trade Commission alleged that Qualcomm’s business practices violated federal and state antitrust law. These practices included (1) Qualcomm’s “no license, no chips” policy, under which Qualcomm refused to sell modem…