Steigleman

Steigleman v. Symetra Life Insurance Company

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 25, 202523-4082California942 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 25 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JILL M. STEIGLEMAN, No. 23-4082 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 3:19-cv-08060-ROS v.

MEMORANDUM*

SYMETRA LIFE INSURANCE

COMPANY, an Iowa corporation,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Roslyn O. Silver, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 4, 2025 Phoenix, Arizona

Before: HAWKINS, BYBEE, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

This is the second appeal involving the applicability of ERISA-preemption to

the state law claims raised in Appellant Jill Steigleman’s (“Steigleman”) lawsuit

against her long-term disability insurance provider, Symetra Life Insurance

Company (“Symetra”). In the prior appeal, we reversed and remanded the district

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. court’s grant of summary judgment to Symetra, concluding factual issues precluded

finding as a matter of law that Symetra…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.