Petrache

Petrache v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 25, 202521-417California323 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 25 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HORTENSIA PETRACHE, No. 21-417 Agency No. Petitioner, A200-231-921 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 18, 2025**

Before: SILVERMAN, WARDLAW, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Hortensia Petrache, a native and citizen of Romania, petitions pro se for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order summarily dismissing

her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her motion to reopen

removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We grant the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). petition for review and remand.

While this petition was pending, the BIA overruled its longstanding…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.