Zamanimahforoujaki

Zamanimahforoujaki v. Caranizadeh CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 25, 2025C100297California3,042 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 2/25/25 Zamanimahforoujaki v. Caranizadeh CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Placer) ----

ALI ZAMANIMAHFOROUJAKI, C100297

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. S-CV- 0049935) v.

SEYEDMOHAMMAD CARANIZADEH,

Defendant and Respondent.

Appellant Ali Zamanimahforoujaki (Zamani) appeals an award of attorney fees, contending that the trial court erred in finding Seyedmohammad Caranizadeh the prevailing party and by awarding excessive and unreasonable fees. We disagree and affirm.

FACTUAL AND LEGAL BACKGROUND

In February 2023, Zamani applied to Placer County Superior Court for a civil harassment restraining order (CHRO) under Code of Civil Procedure section 527.6.1 In support of his application, he…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.