Madatyan

Filed 2/25/25 Madatyan v. Torosian CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

ELDA MADATYAN, B332420

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 20STFL12033) v.

AKOP TOROSIAN,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Bradley S. Phillips, Judge. Reversed. Mazur & Mazur and Janice R. Mazur for Plaintiff and Appellant. Akop Torosian, in propria persona, for Defendant and Respondent. __________________________________ As part of their divorce, appellant Elda Madatyan and respondent Akop Torosian entered into a stipulated judgment.1 In pertinent part, this stipulated judgment provided that: (1) Elda would pay Jack $2,300,000 to buy out his interest in…