Moore

United States v. Moore

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 25, 202524-1937California387 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 25 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-1937 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:22-cr-50174-DWL-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

BERRYON FITZGERALD MOORE III,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Dominic Lanza, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 18, 2025**

Before: SILVERMAN, WARDLAW, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Berryon Fitzgerald Moore III appeals from the district court’s order

revoking his supervised release and challenges three conditions of supervision.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

As a preliminary matter, the parties dispute whether this appeal is timely.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). The government contends that Moore’s pro se notice of appeal was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.