Kulick

Kulick v. Olmstead

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 25, 202524-2129California374 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 25 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

R. J. KULICK, No. 24-2129 D.C. No. 2:23-cv-09335-AB-SK Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

REED H. OLMSTEAD; LAW OFFICES

OF REED H. OLMSTEAD; DOES, 1-100,

inclusive,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California André Birotte Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 18, 2025**

Before: SILVERMAN, WARDLAW, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

R. J. Kulick appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

without prejudice his action alleging various federal and state law claims. We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.