Kulick
Kulick v. Olmstead
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 25, 202524-2129California374 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 25 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
R. J. KULICK, No. 24-2129 D.C. No. 2:23-cv-09335-AB-SK Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. MEMORANDUM*
REED H. OLMSTEAD; LAW OFFICES
OF REED H. OLMSTEAD; DOES, 1-100,
inclusive,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California André Birotte Jr., District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 18, 2025**
Before: SILVERMAN, WARDLAW, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.
R. J. Kulick appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing
without prejudice his action alleging various federal and state law claims. We
have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d…