Kulick

Kulick v. Murchie

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 25, 202524-4384California366 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 25 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

R. J. KULICK, No. 24-4384 D.C. No. 2:23-cv-10915-DSF-PVC Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

JAMES MURCHIE; MARLYNN BLOCK;

RICHARD LOOMIS; RUTH STUBBA;

CHARLES KISKADEN; CHRISTI

MOORE; JEFFREY A. BEAUMONT;

LISA A. TASHJIAN; TARA RADLEY;

BEAUMONT TASHJIAN; DOES, 1-100,

Inclusive; LEISURE VILLAGE

ASSOCIATION, INC.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dale S. Fischer, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 18, 2025**

Before: SILVERMAN, WARDLAW, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). R. J. Kulick appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his

action alleging various federal and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.