Demetrius Franklin v. Raymond Madden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DEMETRIUS FRANKLIN, CV 17-4281 DSF (JC)

Petitioner,

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT

v. AND ADOPTING FINDINGS,

CONCLUSIONS, AND

RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden, RECOMMENDATIONS OF Respondent. UNITED STATES

MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition (Dkt. 1), the relevant records on file, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 70; “Report”), and Petitioner’s Objections to the Report (Dkt. 75; “Objections”). The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. Although not required, the Court briefly discusses the following points. See United States v. Ramos, 65 F.4th 427, 434 (9th Cir. 2023) (“the district court ha[s] no obligation to provide individualized analysis of each objection”); Wang v. Masaitis, 416 F.3d 992, 1000 (9th Cir. 2005) (affirming a cursory district court order summarily adopting, without addressing any objections, a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation). The Report recommends dismissing the Petition’s two remaining claims (i.e., a Brady1…